Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 01:50
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Worms Caught Creating Superorganisms in the Wild for the First Time - Indian Defence Review
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Scientists Uncover Giant Spiders That Once Terrorized Jurassic Earth - The Daily Galaxy
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What are LGBT+ people tired of hearing?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
If women aren't shallow, why do most tall, good-looking men have girlfriends?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
How do you find out who your handler is as a targeted individual?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.